There are over 53324 complaints on file for CITIBANK, N.A.. Dated between 2019-12-12 and 2011-12-01.
2018-04-28
Discovery Bay, CA
Confusing or misleading advertising about the credit card
Complaint: This is really a general complaint about the recent decision made by XXXX and Citigroup to give a hard time to any retailers conducting lawful firearm-related business activities.
I am a regular customer to both banks and feel powerless to be able say anything, I can just see my concerns being ignored letting them know how I feel about it.
There's no need for them to make a political move like this, and doesn't change anything anyways, for example background checks are already required in most circumstances.
I don't think these 2 large financial institutions should be getting involved with this.
I hope this gets to the right place and helps encourage a focus on responsible financial business practise.
Thanks,
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Hamburg, MN
Complaint: Citigroup has decided to make banking decisions on social policy rather than on sound business decisions. How can banks deny banking services to perfectly legal businesses?
With all of the highly personal information that banks collect ; how long before they start enforcing their social policy on consumers? I think the banks that had such poor policies that they required almost {>= $1,000,000} of US taxpayer money shouldn't be trying to push legal businesses out of business.
We need all banks to follow the laws that apply to they and not be listening to fringe groups that encourage them to break the laws of banking. Americans need you to come down hard on banks that aren't following laws and policies that are meant to protect ALL legal businesses and people in the USA.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Kansas City, KS
Was not notified of investigation status or results
Complaint: As a tax payer and a equity owner in CITI, I'm appalled at their boycott of the firearms industry!! Their greed along with other banking institutions resulted in a trillion dollar plus bailout. They should not have the right to deny a legitimate industry the access to monies based on political bias.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
MI
Complaint: XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) and Citigroup using their enormous market power to discriminate against customers based on lawful firearm-related business activities. These decisions were unabashedly prompted and lauded by XXXX activists as political statements and social engineering, not as business decisions based on any alleged financial unsoundness or criminal activity of the affected customers. This feigned high-mindedness is particularly galling to XXXX Americans whose billions of tax dollars helped bail out these financial behemoths after the banks reckless business practices brought their companies and the U.S. economy to the brink of disaster.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Tonalea, AZ
Problem with customer service
Complaint: I am angry that Citi and XXXX XXXX XXXX, bailed out with my tax dolkars, are engaging in social engineering and anti-constitutional practices by refusing to do business with perfectly legal XXXX manufacturers.
Because they accepted tax dollars to cover their mistakes the are now semi- public companies.
Their actions should be sanctioned by regulators
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Roberts, ID
Confusing or misleading advertising about the credit card
Complaint: I am extremely upset as a 21-year customer of Citi 's credit card services that they have recently decided to become politically active and begin discriminate against XXXX manufacturers engaged in legal businesses, bowing to the anti-American policies of so-called progressives. This discrimination against companies that refuse to sell arbitrary classes of firearms is illegal and any and all federal contracts must be pulled from private enterprises that engage in such age discrimination.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Ocklawaha, FL
Confusing or misleading advertising about the credit card
Complaint: Citibank and XXXX XXXX XXXX have determined they will discriminate against law abiding citizens exercising their second amendment rights under the constitution by taking political, non-business-like actions to inhibit citizens rights. As second amendment advocates, we take exception to this marxist, political grandstanding and expect the CFPB to take action against these banks to prevent this political grandstanding. Further, as we work to take action against these banks, and, in turn, expect the CFPB to do the same, we are proceeding to terminate a more than 30-year relationship with Citibank and open accounts with their non-discriminating competitors. Your assistance and actions against this discrimination are essential. We need your help.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Odell, OR
Complaint: Recently XXXX XXXX XXXX and Citigroup have initiated action regarding the Second Amendment to restrict legal business activities regarding providing financial services and resources regarding the manufacture and sale of firearms. This action is politically motivated, violates sound business practices, infringes on my constitutional rights by being discriminatory, and appears to violate anti-trust laws by recent statements from the CEO of Citigroup.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Moapa, NV
Complaint: On XX/XX/XXXX, Citigroup announced that it was " setting restrictions on the sale of firearms by its business customers ''. This is a coercive move made to discourage their business customers from dealing in completely lawful transactions.
This action by Citigroup will not just result in financial harm to the merchants affected, but will also negatively impact the civil rights of American citizens in the exercise their 2nd Amendment rights.
That a company, after having received a massive bailout from the taxpayers, can ignore the constitutional rights of American citizens and inflict financial damage on their commercial customers is an outrage and must be stopped!
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
ID
Delay in processing application
Complaint: From the XXXX - We recently reported on the disturbing trend of large U.S. banks most notably XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) and Citigroup using their enormous market power to discriminate against customers based on lawful firearm-related business activities. These decisions were unabashedly prompted and lauded by anti-gun activists as political statements and social engineering, not as business decisions based on any alleged financial unsoundness or criminal activity of the affected customers. This feigned high-mindedness is particularly galling to gun-owning Americans whose billions of tax dollars helped bail out these financial behemoths after the banks reckless business practices brought their companies and the U.S. economy to the brink of disaster. Now, pro-gun members of Congress are demanding answers and accountability. You can do your part, too, by lodging your own complaints against the banks with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Vacaville, CA
Trouble getting, activating, or registering a card
Complaint: As an American citizen, tax payer, voter, customer, consumer, active participant of the community, and one who served our country in the military through the United States Coast Guard, it is deeply concerning to me, when large national banks which receive significant forms of government support and benefits, use their market power to manage social policy by withholding access to credit to customers and companies they disfavor. I am referring to us members of the XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ), and us law abiding citizens who strongly believe in the Second Amendment of the US Constitution, ... the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.. Who are the banks to make public policy and knowingly target our rights? That is not their role, and is a form of discrimination and intimidation. Please act swiftly and decisively against such banks, ( Citibank being one of them ), to make them accountable and align themselves with the US Constitution. Thanks so much.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Agua Dulce, TX
Other problem
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Madison, WI
Account status incorrect
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
IL
Complaint: My problems is the illegal discrimination that citigroup and it's ceo XXXX XXXX are using against XXXX companies and XXXX owners. Why would you bow to a few and not allow legal XXXX transactions from law abiding citizens and XXXX companies? You are forcing your views on me and other XXXX owner. You are infringing upon my rights as a legal XXXX owner to make legal purchases. This does not do anything to curb XXXX problems in this country. Your institution was bailed by people like me. I guess we can put you under by not patronizing your company and others like XXXX XXXX XXXX. We as XXXX owners can have our voice heard by hurting your pocketbook.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Swiftwater, PA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Murray, UT
Can't use card to make purchases
Complaint: To whom it may concern, I'm writing to convey my frustration with Citibank and any other financial institution, who find it appropriate to prohibit legal sales of firearms. The responsibility of these creditors is to provide a secure and simple means of purchasing, not to impose their own set of laws ; if a private, small-business baker can't choose to deny based on their faith or societal proclivity, neither should any prodigious, public, taxpayer-bailout-fund taking large business.
Their time would be better spent establishing a system to prevent scammers and any fraudulent intent used by their system, not prohibit any and all legal transactions made by law-abiding citizens.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
MN
Privacy issues
Complaint: In XXXX XXXX 2018 Citi decided to take it upon themselves to be able to decide what kind of legal firearms components I could purchase. This is an invasion of my privacy and personal rights. They way over stepped their role and how they insert themselves into our private lives.They are bullying us legal creditcard holders that have the citi double cash back card. My citi mastercard number is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
WI
Confusing or misleading advertising about the credit card
Complaint: I am a member of the XXXX and I believe recent action taken by Citi with regard to XXXX control is discriminating against law-abiding citizens like myself. Big Banks who have been bailed out by the taxpayers of America should not be setting policies that should be left to our lawmakers. I have been a customer of CITI for over 15 years and I'm very close to closing my account because of this action.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
PA
Can't use card to make purchases
Complaint: I am a law abiding small business owner. Who is a proud supporter of our constitutional rights, these freedoms granted to us help our nation flourish. As a business owner I pay my fair share of taxes and it wasn't long ago that this bank got a bail out. I am extremely upset with they're new policy restricting me from buying guns with my credit card. Most stores don't like checks or XXXX dollar bills so what am I supposed to do as a consumer who wants to purchase these products? I feel this new rule is illegal and unconstitutional and I would like this decision to be reversed.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Albany, OR
Other problem
Complaint: I resent Citibank and XXXX XXXX XXXX using resources generated by my use of their credit cards to promote XXXX control. I am XXXX XXXX XXXX, a XXXX, have a carry permit and support the XXXX. It is a hassle to change credit cards but that will be my next step.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Hornell, NY
Other problem
Complaint: CitiBank and other large banks have taken it upon themselves to unfairly restrict access to credit and other services by companies I do business with. Specifically, companies that have anything to do with firearms and related products. On one hand, my taxes, and taxes paid by these same companies, paid for a huge bailout of Citi and other banks, to supposedly save them. On the other hand, they are unfairly targeting these companies, trying to hurt them specifically, to cause them to fail. That is inconsistent with constitutional protections of my, and their, 2nd amendment rights. This needs to be called out, and stopped.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2018-04-28
Long Beach, CA
Account information incorrect
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with non-monetary relief
2018-04-28
Foothill Ranch, CA
Credit card company isn't resolving a dispute about a purchase on your statement
Complaint: I hired XXXX XXXX XXXX to install a custom wine cellar in my home.
In his contract there is a final payment that is to be made after completion of the project. As we stand today XX/XX/XXXX this contractor has not completed the project. The refrigeration is not installed and is not even on site. His installation person, XXXX, damaged the wine cellar door by drilling the hole incorrectly. He then compounded it by trying to force the lock into the crooked hole resulting in a damaged lock.
I contacted XXXX XXXX and explained the issue and asked him if he would like to return and correct the issue or would he like me to contact the locksmith to see if he could fix the lock and correctly install the lock. He instructed me to call the locksmith. I told him that he was responsible for the repair and that if he could get some stain it will be needed to repair the door. He told me that there would be a half of a pint of stain in the cellar. I told him that there was none and I double checked with another person. He said that he would order some. I called several times to inquire and after a month I called my cabinet finisher to see if he could stain the door and hide the damage after I asked my cabinet person to try and fill the hole that was left when the installed decided to drill half of the hole from each side and the holes did not line up straight. I have not received the cabinet persons bill yet and I have only received the bill for the outside of the door. It looks funny as it is two different shades so the rest of the door will have to be stained to insure uniformity.
What I learned when I examined my statement was that XXXX XXXX fraudulently charged my credit card for the final payment upon completion which I not only did not authorize, but I told him that he could not charge the card for any amount that I did not sign off on. He did this to avoid responsibility for his peoples damage to the installation.
There are other damage issues that need to be paid for as listed below : 1. XXXX inspected and monitored the installation of the cellar himself including the placement of the foam insulation which ws placed after the conduit was run for the electrical light switches and the thermostat. When his installers showed up they installed right over the switchboxes which meant that the walls had to be opened and the thermostat and light switches ahd to be moved to a new location. This included costs for the electrician, the drywall people and the painter as well as the cabinet maker having to modify the cabinetry to accept the thermostat and the light switches. The electrician and the drywall change costs were {$450.00} per my contractor XXXX.
2. The cabinet costs associated with this will not be clear until cabinet person gives me his final bill.
3. The locksmith charged me {$150.00} to un-bend the lock and straighten he home on XX/XX/XXXX, which is the day that I called XXXX and told him the charge and he them with out my knowledge or authorization charged my credit card for the {$1800.00}.
4. The Cabinet finishing person finished the door outside but not inside the jamb or on the inside of the door and it looks funny so the entire door needs to match. The first part of the cost was, {$450.00} and the rest of the door will cost an additional {$350.00} and will be completed next week.
I am trying to be reasonable. I am not responsible for the damage that his contractor created. I offered XXXX XXXX XXXX the opportunity to return and fix the issue or offered to have it done. They have not responded to me since they charged my credit card which is totally not acceptable.
This vendor acknowledges that he was aware of the damage. He acknowledges that I would not give him authorization to use my credit card for the entire payment of this project by altering his bills to write the amount that was acceptable for the work performed at various agreed upon points. When there was a problem he used the number from a previouis charge without my knowledge or authorization. He never attempted to remedy any of the issues that he was responsible for.
He does not have the right to take my credit card and charge it without my authorization or knowledge. This is fraud.
Respectfully, XXXX XXXX
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with monetary relief
2018-04-28
Beyersville, TX
Privacy issues
Complaint: Recently Citibank publicly stated they are no longer supporting businesses with loans and other financing related issues that are connected to or involved with the firearms industry, including companies that build firearms and accessories. Through the power that Citibank holds with their ability To destroy companies operating legally and manufacturing legal items, they are attempting to legislate through ( social ) virtue signaling rather than Congress legislating.
As Ciitibank owns a number of private companys credit card and credit card services such as Home Depot, XXXX and others, I firmly believe that their privacy policies need to include information that they are withholding and or no longer loaning or servicing businesses that are involved in the firearms industry. This is a direct infringement on the second amendment to our Constitution. Personally, I will no longer be using credit cards I hold for XXXX, Home Depot and any other businesses that are owned by Citibank.
It is imperative that consumers understand that Citibank discriminates concerning the firearms industry so that those consumers can make the decision to do business or not with Citibank or any other businesses that are owned by, supported by or otherwise financially connected to Citibank.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation