There are over 4954 complaints on file for Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. Dated between 2019-12-06 and 2012-04-23.
2016-03-11
Chicago, IL
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-03-10
Discovery Bay, CA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-10
Palos Park, IL
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-10
OK
Debt was discharged in bankruptcy
Complaint: Debt was discharged through Foreclosure not Bankrputcy. In 2009 I received a XXXX from XXXX and on my XXXX of my 2009 taxes my account declared it as a sale of a property which accounted for the XXXX XXXX XXXX ad the XXXX loan. I never received the Capitol Gain, but did pay taxes on it. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC has now sent me another XXXX for the same debt. I should not be getting a XXXX XXXX for the same debt. I have tried uploading a copy of the 2009 XXXX to your sight but have not been able to. Will put copy of XXXX from 2009 in the mail to you
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-09
Bremen, GA
Complaint: Hello my mortgage was transferred from XXXX XXXX to this company called SLS Specialized Loan Services llc XX/XX/2015. before my loan was transferred I had a monthly payment with XXXX XXXX for {$580.00} per month including taxes and insurance, never missing a month payment. XX/XX/2015 XXXX XXXX increased my payment to {$630.00} claiming the insurance had gone up. After my loan was transferred in XXXX 2015, my first three months were the same at {$630.00} then my XX/XX/XXXX statement came with a new monthly payment of $ XXXX/per month. I then called this new company SLS and was told there is an escrow shortage, this company SLS increased my monthly payment again it then went from XXXX to XXXX plus an additional amount of {$270.00} per month. This amount is not adding up unless iam paying double and triple for escrow. Iam asking for this to be resolved please.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-08
Jefferson, NH
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-08
Cumberland, RI
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-03-08
Balcones Heights, TX
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-08
Grand View, ID
Complaint: My complaint is against Specialized Loan Servicing ( SLS ). We were switched over to SLS a few months ago and it has already been a nightmare. We never received any statements from SLS until we were mailed foreclosure papers. My husband called up SLS and at first they were not even sure they had us in their system. What?! He was finally able to figure out the amount owed and we mailed it out thinking it was just a fluke. We, again, have not received any statements so, again, my husband had to call to see what was going on. We were told SLS does not send out statements unless we send them a request in writing. We are pretty sure that we are being overcharged as well but we have no itemized statements for reference. We are not sure what game SLS is playing but we feel this company seems to be setting clients up for foreclosure. SLS is the most unprofessional financial company we have ever dealt with in the 16 years that we have been home owners.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-03-08
Cumberland, RI
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-03-08
Anaheim, CA
Complaint: SLS and the foreclosure trustee is illegally foreclosing on the my property and I have an approved short sale file that SLS granted and now they have a sale date for XXXX XXXX, 2016.
Re : XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX You as a trustee have committed a violation under HBOR along with SLS Mortgage under the " dual tracking '' law considering the APPROVED Short Sale that is currently active and in process. A separate complaint was file with the State Bar of California against the attorney office for conspiring to conduct this illegally foreclosure sale.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-07
Irvington, NJ
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-07
Bremen, GA
Complaint: Lender is foreclosing on my home XXXX/XXXX/16. I have not received notices until XXXX/XXXX/16 as I was living with a friend temporarily and notices were not forwarded -- for over 6 months. Post office registered my new address, but documents did not reach me. They are now going to send me a modification pkg, but need 37 BUSINESS DAYS to review it, yet foreclosure is in less than 30 days! I need foreclosure delayed, postponed or canceled so I can complete required paperwork on their end. The lender told me their ATTORNEY was the one to contact to postpone foreclosure, and the ATTORNEY told me the LENDER has to be the one to postpone foreclosure. Please help.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-06
Aptos, CA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-06
San Gabriel, CA
Debt was paid
Complaint: SLS Continues to send Me Statements attempting to collect a debt that has been satisfied and extinguished Code of Civil Procedure XXXX ( 2000 XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX. ) No Assignment provided Was this Alleged Debt Purchased?
If yes From who?
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-06
Lb, CA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-04
Mount Oliver, PA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-03
Dublin, CA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed
2016-03-03
Arsenal, PA
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-03-03
Tuckasegee, NC
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-03
Discovery Bay, CA
Complaint: This issue remains unresolved, and I find it necessary to update the record to address concerns, about Specialized Loan Services ( SLS ), not covered or supported by documentation earlier.
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) transferred the mortgage loan to SLS, effective XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. See Exhibit A.
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, Specialized Loan Services assigned the mortgage loan number, xxx. The notice set forth unpaid principal at {$440000.00}, uncollected interest at {$2000.00}, escrow /balance at $ XXXX, and outstanding fees that totaled {$910.00}. See Exhibit B.
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, SLS sent the Notice of Servicing Transfer effective XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. Exhibit C.
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, I paid SLS {$3100.00}, on loan # xxxx, for initial payment due XXXX, XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. See Exhibit XXXX SLS applied the XXXX/XXXX/XXXX payment to a debt claim of {$3100.00}, allegedly due, for XXXX mortgage payment by XXXX.
I disputed the SLS payment to XXXX, immediately. To date, XXXX has not submitted a proper bill in any amount for any outstanding claim of debt. XXXX ceased communicating with me after XXXX found errors and adjusted the online loan transaction history.
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, after discussion with SLS, I disputed the payment to XXXX, in writing. See Exhibit E.
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, SLS sent a demand for {$10000.00}, due XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. Exhibit F.
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, SLS sent notice of changes to the mortgage interest rate and payment to take effect on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. SLS states that the interest rate stayed the same for six months and that period ends XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, so the rate and mortgage payment will change. See Exhibit G.
XXXX made a change to the mortgage interest rate effective XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. That change included an increase in the interest rate and payment that, contrary to the SLS claim, has not stayed the same for six months. SLS must know that this new debt claim violates the ARM agreement much like SLS knows that collecting disputed debt from me on behalf of XXXX is wrong and beyond the scope of the agreement. XXXX must be held accountable to justify the claim and not simply allowed to rely on a third party, SLS, to collect a disputed claim without proof.
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, SLS sent a Mortgage Payment Delinquency Notice. Exhibit H. Five days later, on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, SLS sent a second delinquent notice demanding {$3900.00}, including {$3100.00} Monthly Payment, {$910.00} in Fees /Advance, and {$110.00} in Suspense Balance. See Exhibit I.
The fees listed by SLS are not legitimate. Again, SLS is attempting to collect on a claim that XXXX made during my Bankruptcy and hid from the Court when filing a Response Notice To Cure Final Payment on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. XXXX admitted, in writing, to making errors in servicing the loan including overcharging my escrow account for 19 months. XXXX adjusted the loan account and failed to submit a written demand for payment, including fees, and SLS does not provide sufficient details, proof of claim.
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, I paid SLS {$3100.00} for XXXX. See Exhibit J.
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, I paid SLS {$3100.00} for XXXX. See Exhibit K.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed
2016-03-02
Lincoln, CA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-02
Falls Church, VA
Debt is not mine
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-02
Lincoln, CA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-03-02
GA
Complaint: My wife and I have been pursuing a short sale on a house we own. The interest-only period adjusted on our property, and we can no longer afford the mortgage. The value of the house has depreciated to the point that it is not worth near what we owe on the house. We started the process in XXXX XXXX. We have a buyer who is willing to pay the full amount our real estate representatives calculated was a fair market price. After having all the paperwork together and all financing prepared by buyer, the mortgage changed hands from XXXX to SLS. After resubmitting everything and being very diligent with the paperwork, the closing date was moved three more times by SLS because they were not ready. This caused my buyer to re-secure financing because her original agreement expired. More inspections and appraisals followed until everything was ready by the buyer and, we assumed, SLS. On Monday, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, SLS informed me that my short sale had been rejected by the PMI provider. My real estate attourneys informed me that I needed to file an appeal. I contacted the PMI provider, XXXX XXXX, and they informed me that they did not reject the short sale, they actually accepted it with an {$8200.00} promissary. I contacted SLS about this and they did not have any record of this on file. After contacting XXXX again, and talking to another representative, they confirmed that they talked to an SLS rep named XXXX XXXX and told her that they accepted the offer with the {$8200.00} promissary. Rather than recording this offer, SLS closed out my short sale file Monday morning. This is not acting in my best interest. I would have been very receptive to this offer rather than having to start the whole short sale process over again. My buyer has been waiting around for over 8 months now, and I am in danger of them just walking away. This would result in me probably losing the house to foreclosure. At this point, we are desperate for help. SLS is not doing what the government says the lenders should to provide foreclosure alternatives to us homeowners. They had a good offer that they refused to notify me about.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation