There are over 9109 complaints on file for SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. Dated between 2019-12-06 and 2012-02-28.
2015-06-12
Placentia, CA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-11
Jupiter, FL
Complaint: I am trying to do a short sale on my home in order to avoid a foreclosure, at this point I along with my realtor have done everything that Select Portfolio Servicing " SPS '' asked of us.
We got a cash offer for XXXX. SPS 's XXXX. shows non comparable properties that are located in a different and more expensive neighborhood " my house is the second largest in my neighborhood '', which are XXXX TO XXXX above value. My realtor who has over fifteen years experience in this area sent comparable examples in the same neighborhood showing the accurate value, but these have been ignored. There is a foreclosure sale date scheduled for XXXX XXXX. I received a letter from SPS dated XXXX XXXX stating I would have an answer in fifteen business days which is today XXXX XXXX. My realtor speaking on my behalf called them today to inquire as to they 're decision, they said we would be told by the end of the month.
When we mentioned to them that we would be contacting the CFPB they said we would have an answer by next Wednesday " XXXX XXXX ''.
At this point I fear that SPS will turn down the short sale in retaliation to my complaint.
Please help me to resolve this matter so that the buyer does n't walk, and I do n't have my house foreclosed.
Thank you.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-11
Prior Lake, MN
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-11
San Jacinto, CA
Complaint: I AM ATTEMPTING TO AVOID A FORECLOSURE SALE AND I HAVE APPLIED FOR MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE. MY SERVICER, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING ( SPS ), IS PROCESSING MY REQUEST FOR MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE. IN A LETTER DATED XXXX XXXX, 2015 SPS REQUESTS ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FROM ME AND IN THIS LETTER THEY PROVIDE A XXXX/XXXX/2015 DEADLINE. IN ANOTHER LETTER DATED XXXX/XXXX/2015, SPS NOTIFIES ME THAT THEY HAVE SCHEDULED A FORECLOSURE SALE FOR XXXX/XXXX/2015. ON XXXX XXXX, 2015 IN A PHONE CONVERSATION WITH SPS, A REQUEST WAS MADE THAT SPS RETRACT THE LETTER NOTING THE SALE DATE IN WRITING VIA EMAIL. THAT EMAIL OR RETRACTION HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED. SPS IS ENGAGED IN DUAL TRACKING AND PREFERS TO PROFIT FROM THIS METHOD. THEY PRESENT A FACADE OF HELPFULNESS SO THAT THEY CURE LURE HOMEOWNERS INTO FORECLOSURES.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-11
Foothill Ranch, CA
Complaint: Select Portfolio Servicing : Fraudulent loan modification application from Mortgage Servicer. Loss of documentation. Incomplete response to QWR. Dual Tracking during loss mitigation.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-11
Bohemia, NY
Complaint: My office is helping an elderly couple with the short sale of their property. An offer was obtained within XXXX of bank 's asking price, to further move this matter along my office requested reduction in all Closing costs to maximize the amount being received by the bank. We keep getting denied stating that investor guidelines are not being followed with no clarification. My client 's can not afford this home and do n't wish to have it sitting under their name for years until it 's foreclosed we need assistance.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-10
Irvine, CA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-10
Loves Park, IL
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-10
Midwest City, OK
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-09
San Francisco, CA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-09
Rahway, NJ
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-09
Phoenix, AZ
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-09
Cumberland, RI
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-09
Avon, CO
Frequent or repeated calls
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-09
Rochdale, NY
Company Response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error Closed with explanation
2015-06-08
San Diego, CA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-08
Gibsonton, FL
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-08
Havana, FL
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-08
Billerica, MA
Complaint: On XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX who was servicing our mortgage loan XXXX sent us a letter indicating that we had to purchase flood insurance. In response to this letter we visited the XXXX of XXXX office to verify is our property located at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX had been classified or considered to be in a flood zone. They said no. We proceeded to contact XXXX who informed us that if we did not purchase flood insurance we would be in violation in terms of our mortgage loan. We then proceeded to purchase flood insurance. During this period of time we were under Chapter XXXX Bankruptcy Protection Case XXXX yet XXXX failed to notify Bankruptcy Court of a new added requirement that was neither part of the Chapter XXXX Confirmed Plan or part of our initial mortgage loan obligation. In XXXX XXXX we received a letter from US District of Oregon notifying us of a class action suite Case No. XXXX : XXXX identifying us of victims of flood insurance fraud. It was claimed that XXXX ( XXXX ) violated the legal rights of its consumer requiring them to purchase excessive amount of flood insurance coverage and by arranging for improper kickbacks for itself and/or its affiliates ( including in the form of commissions in connection with forced-placed flood insurance. Our mortgage loan was transferred from XXXX to SPS Portfolio Servicing on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX we received a similar letter from SPS Portfolio claiming that we had to purchase yet again another fraudulent flood insurance coverage. Our SPS loan number is XXXX. We remain protected under US Bankruptcy Chapter XXXX yet SPS has also failed to obtain approval and notify bankruptcy court of a forced insurance coverage that was neither part of our original mortgage loan or part of the confirmed Chapter XXXX Plan.
Thank youXXXX XXXX XXXX
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-08
Cadwell, GA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-08
Campbell, CA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-06
Patterson, MD
Complaint: I was with XXXX prior to my mortgage being sold amost at the end of their modification and they sold my account to Select Portfolio Servicing. In doing so the modification had to start over from scratch. I did have a problem paying my mortgage ( due to loss of income through divorce with XXXX ), and received assistance from the XXXX program ( a third party ), but was never late. XXXX informed me by them being involved sending part of my payment I would not be accountable for any lateness on my payments, because I was always current with the part I paid ; they did recieve the full mortage payment. This would apply also through XXXX and until the modification was completed. By XXXX selling the mortgage just before the modification was completed, and me being at the end of the program starting over ; I had to go into an agreement with Select Portfolo to avoid foreclosure while their modification was in process. I was to pay an amount agreed upon, until it was completed. It was n't the full amount, but it was accepted and an agreement was in place, and that amount was never late. Now I am sited with 120days late on my mortgage, after all that was agreed upon. My modification is now in place and I have been current with my payments since the modification XXXX of 2015. I think this is unfair and if there is someone that can possible help me with this, it will truly be appreciated. Originally the loan was a ( ARM ) mortgage.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-06
Beaverton, OR
Complaint: I contacted Select Portfolio LLC ( who have held my original mortgage for 9 years ) to try and refinance through the HARP LOAN process. This request was to be completed within 3 months. I am a XXXX and had some trouble keeping a " stable '' job for a little over 2 years. During this time, Select Portfolio lowered my payments ( to {$820.00} ) while I was pursuing a career in XXXX and XXXX at XXXX College and XXXX College ( XXXX ). After completing the schools, Select Portfolio resumed my original note payment of {$1500.00} per month. I also have a {$190.00} per month HOA payment. I can not make these payments ( even though I rent to XXXX person for {$400.00} per month ). I now have a ''stable '' job ( also Oil Royalties averaging {$600.00} per month ) and know I could make loan payments of {$1000.00} per month plus my HOA payment. I have been making {$1500.00} payments for the last 9 months at the original rate of 8.3 %. Select Portfolio has stated over the telephone to me and my accountant that the information requested would complete the loan application and that they could let us know within 5 business days of theoutcome of the HARP loan applied for. They requested more information after making these statements XXXX different times. The continual lack of honest communication concerning my loan has affected my mental health. Select Portfolio also calls and uses abusive techniques concerning my monthly payments. I have withheld my XX/XX/XXXX payment because of the handling of my HARP loan. My credit score is poor and I do not know why they continue asking for more current information and processing this loan if, in fact, I do n't qualify. This continued pursuit of this loan is showing a complete lack of good faith.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-05
Palm Desert, CA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-06-05
Palm Desert, CA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation