Hunt Henriques

2016-03-24

Yuba City, CA

Communication tactics

Debt collection: Credit card

Called after sent written cease of comm
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-03-24

Altadena, CA

False statements or representation

Debt collection: Credit card

Attempted to collect wrong amount
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-03-15

Anaheim, CA

Communication tactics

Debt collection: Credit card

Frequent or repeated calls
Complaint: The Hunt & Henriques Attorneys would begin calling my cell phone XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and Home XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX since XXXX XXXX until XXXX XXXX. They would call several times between those hours. It got so bad that I had to end up changing my phone number, just to avoid being called all day. Al Then they began to stalk me in front of my home. They would park and watch me maybe about XXXX15 min. This would take place during the week. They kept on doing this until they saw my husband outside and ask for me and gave him the court order that they were suing me.
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-03-07

Soquel, CA

Improper contact or sharing of info

Debt collection: I do not know

Contacted employer after asked not to
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-02-10

Pasadena, CA

Disclosure verification of debt

Debt collection: Credit card

Not given enough info to verify debt
Complaint: I. Hunt and Henriques sent me a letter dated XXXX/XXXX/XXXX stating 1 ) they had been retained by XXXX, 2 ) notice of opportunity to contact within 30 days to dispute the debt, and 3 ) a statement they are a debt collector. The letter was delivered uncertified. II. I responded on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. In that letter, I asked Hunt and Henriques to validate the date. The letter stated to respond to a specific Notary Public ( who would verify and validate receipt of said validation ) within 30 days. The letter was sent by certified mail and received by Hunt and Henriques on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. III. I also pulled down my credit report and saw that this debt had been charged off. IV. I was served with a lawsuit on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX by Hunt and Henriques regarding this matter. ISSUE : This firm stated they were retained by XXXX. That claim is patently false, since the debt was charged off. If Insert Original Lender was still pursuing this debt, it would not be at that status, so this firm has made a false statement regarding its disposition on this matter. Further, this firm has stated they are a debt collector further down in the letter. This indicates that they obtained this debt as third party debt collector. The statements made by Hunt and Henriques in the letter are fraudulent and misleading, and intended to intimidate. Further, Hunt and Henriques has extended this fraud into court.
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-01-28

San Francisco, CA

Communication tactics

Debt collection: Credit card

Called outside of 8am-9pm
Complaint: I sent payment through my bank online. Informed XXXX from Hunt and Henriques that payment was sent and that it might take 5 days for them to receive. She calls me and leaves me a message that payment has not been received. I checked my online banking and it says payment is " paid ''. I also printed out a proof of payment. Called and spoke with XXXX again to let her know that my checking account is reflecting the payment has been paid and asked her to double check. She says she does n't see payment has been paid and does't double check. I ask her again to check, She insist she does n't see it and to call back later to check again.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-01-06

Rncho Domingz, CA

Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed

Debt collection: Credit card

Debt is not mine
Complaint: Hunt & Henriques, Attorneys at Law are debt collectors and violated the terms of the credit card agreement with XXXX XXXX by 1 ) filing a lawsuit instead of binding arbitration ; 2 ) Taking action against the authorized signatory holding the corporate credit card issued in the name of a limited liability corporation ; 3 ) Using threatening tactics in order to force authorized signatory into settling the account under duress. This complaint is being submitted in order to allow Hunt & Henriques an opportunity to respond instead of claiming they did not receive the previous complaint and exhibits which support my position this case.
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2016-01-05

Petaluma, CA

Communication tactics

Debt collection: Credit card

Threatened to take legal action
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-12-30

Rncho Domingz, CA

Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed

Debt collection: Credit card

Debt is not mine
Company Response: Company can't verify or dispute the facts in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-11-15

San Bernardino, CA

Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed

Debt collection: Credit card

Debt resulted from identity theft
Complaint: This debt collector continuous send out late, time sensitive documents that look like junk mail, unsolicited adverting and some of this mail to my current address had no return address. I am not sure the how they sent the alleged collect documents in the pass however I was not notified of this debt till years after the court proceedings against me. This company levied my student financial aid. Although the company no that the levied fund are exempt they refuse to return them. This company forced my student college fund closed at XXXX Bank. Their caused me to fail classed and force me to drop out of school. This company has extorted money from my college fund that was from a inmate trust account check that did not belong to me. this company financial bulling has cause me to fall XXXX. I also am still considered a student however I can not return to school with this company beating me up financial where I can afford food, books, tuition and the necessaries a student would need to do well. I believe that I do not owe this debt because there was activity on the card on a date I was in another state where my purse was snatched off my arm and i had to have new car keys made, purchase cell phone. I also stayed at the hotel because it happen on the property the manage comp me a room and I used cash to stay a few more nights to help look for the assailant. I work with XXXX would have record of that.
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-06-08

San Jose, CA

False statements or representation

Debt collection: Credit card

Indicated shouldn't respond to lawsuit
Complaint: Dear CFPB-I was served court documents by the above named Law Firm dated XXXX XXXX 2015. After following through filing and answering back to this Law Firm with proper legal documents. We have received more legal/letter documents dated XXXX XXXX. 2015, upon reading and reviewing all the documents, the Law Firm has erroneously and falsely indicated in these forms that I had acknowledge having legal counsel concerning my rights and stipulation concerning these forms. Also from previous phone conversations on XXXX XXXX. 2015, we had requested XXXX ( Law Firm Representative ) to please contact XXXX that we are willing to settle the debt for half the amount if possible. We feel that she never attempted to contacted the Bank, other then admitting that the debt was reviewed and that our request is denied. I also feel that my rights as a consumer are being violated by this Law Firm forcefully wanting me sign their forms/documents. Please advise me of proper legal proceeding with this Law Firm. Thank you kindly for your assistance. Respectfully-XXXX XXXX XXXX
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-06-05

Cupertino, CA

Disclosure verification of debt

Debt collection: Other (i.e. phone, health club, etc.)

Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-05-15

Santa Rosa, CA

Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed

Debt collection: Credit card

Debt was discharged in bankruptcy
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-04-24

Irvine, CA

Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed

Debt collection: Credit card

Debt resulted from identity theft
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-04-09

Sierra Madre, CA

Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed

Debt collection: Credit card

Debt is not mine
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-04-06

Long Beach, CA

Taking/threatening an illegal action

Debt collection: Credit card

Seized/Attempted to seize property
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with non-monetary relief

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-04-01

Mill Valley, CA

Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed

Debt collection: Credit card

Debt is not mine
Company Response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-03-05

Santa Monica, CA

Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed

Debt collection: Credit card

Debt resulted from identity theft
Company Response: Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-03-03

San Francisco, CA

Taking/threatening an illegal action

Debt collection: Credit card

Threatened to sue on too old debt
Company Response: Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-02-12

American Canyon, CA

False statements or representation

Debt collection: Credit card

Attempted to collect wrong amount
Company Response: Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-02-04

Paradise, CA

False statements or representation

Debt collection: Credit card

Attempted to collect wrong amount
Company Response: Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-01-27

Arrowhead Farms, CA

Disclosure verification of debt

Debt collection: I do not know

Right to dispute notice not received
Company Response: Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-01-20

Hemet, CA

Communication tactics

Debt collection: Credit card

Threatened to take legal action
Company Response: Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-01-07

San Francisco, CA

Improper contact or sharing of info

Debt collection: I do not know

Talked to a third party about my debt
Company Response: Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-01-05

Pasadena, CA

Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed

Debt collection: Credit card

Debt was paid
Company Response: Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response