There are over 112 complaints on file for Suttell, Hammer White, P.S. Dated between 2019-11-26 and 2013-09-25.
2016-12-27
Bothell, WA
Debt is not mine
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-12-20
Jennings Lodge, OR
Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-12-15
WA
Indicated shouldn't respond to lawsuit
Complaint: Debtor timely responded to debt collection lawsuit by filing an appropriate Answer and Notice of Appearance. Plaintiff debt collector then filed a Motion for Default twice and denied receiving the Answer, which there was proof of filing, mailing, and proper service.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-11-01
San Francisco, CA
Threatened to sue on too old debt
Complaint: the law offices of suttell, Hammer & white sued me and got a judgement against me on time barred debt and now my check is being garnished
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-09-15
Brentwood, CA
Debt was discharged in bankruptcy
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-08-25
Arco, CA
Indicated shouldn't respond to lawsuit
Complaint: XXXX XXXX sold my debt to Suttell, Hammer, & White. The debt is legitimate. I asked, as per attached letters, Suttell, Hammer & White to cease all collection attempts and to stop ALL contact with me. The company has not only ignored my requests, but has been threatening me with legal action, mailing make lawsuits, tormenting, oppressing, and engaging in false, misleading, unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent practices. I am perfectly fine it this company wants to sue me. If they do, I 'll reply, but they can not continue to act with impunity by violating, blatantly, the XXXX Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-08-23
Hercules, CA
Debt is not mine
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-07-22
Woodland, WA
Sued w/o proper notification of suit
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-07-07
Langlois, OR
Called after sent written cease of comm
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-19
Moscow, ID
Threatened to take legal action
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-04-19
Diablo Grande, CA
Sued w/o proper notification of suit
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-04-19
Portland, OR
Debt resulted from identity theft
Complaint: This debt is not known to me
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-04-19
Pasadena, CA
Impersonated an attorney or official
Complaint: To Whom it XXXX Concern : Suttle, Hammer and White identified themselves as Attorney 's via letter correspondence when they served me with a summons to appear in court in 2015. But when I call, the voice mail states the opposite as do the reps that pick up your call. I negotiated with SHW to pay {$1800.00} with {$1200.00} down and {$100.00} a month there after. I paid {$1400.00} instead and have diligently paid the {$100.00} agreed upon amount. I sent check # XXXX dated XX/XX/XXXX for the agreed amount of {$100.00} and requested a receipt that this was the last payment. Instead of correcting me that it was in fact not the last payment, Suttle, Hammer and White sent my check back to me with a letter stating it was not the last payment. Not only was this an adolescent and lame response, this jeopardizes the payment plan I had to agree too and now I am concerned of late fees. So, instead of cashing the check that I wrote, they sent it back because I wrote on an index card requesting a receipt that this was the last payment.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-04-14
Alameda, CA
Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-04-02
WA
Threatened to sue on too old debt
Complaint: I quit paying XXXX XXXX because I have. XXXX & lost my job. This is an very old debt and this cdebt collector will not say who they are & want they want without making me answer questions that they say is being recorded. It 's White Hammel & Something out of XXXX. For years they have called me & threatened to sue me. They said my debt will never reach a time when is it expires. How long can this go on.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-03-17
Seattle, WA
Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-03-17
First Consumers Nat Bank, OR
Contacted me after I asked not to
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-02-05
Greenwood, CA
Debt was paid
Complaint: In XXXX I did default on my XXXX XXXX and it was sent to collection in XXXX ... .which at that time the company under the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX California did harass me over the phone and by text messages for about a year. I try several times to settle the matter with them by offering to make payments they refused stating it had to all at once. Since I did n't have that money and was failing financially it was not resolved. I did n't hear from this agency again until XXXX when my checking and saving accounts where completely emptied, that same day I received a Notice of XXXX that had transpired on XXXX XXXX, XXXX ... my moneys where removed on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. I also received a phone call from the case worker that same day, in which she laughed at me and stated " I finally got you. '' Since that day I assumed this debt was satisfied and I have never heard from them again. On Monday XXXX XXXX, XXXX I received a letter from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Washington for XXXX XXXX stating that I now owe them {$11000.00} and they are trying to collect now on a debt that is XXXX XXXX XXXX and I thought had be satisfied in XXXX. When I spoke to them on the phone they offered little to no information, other than the fact that there was no documentation in the file they had purchased from the original collection agency. My question to you is can they continue this action?
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-02-02
Vallejo, CA
Threatened to sue on too old debt
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-01-06
Duwamish, WA
Sued w/o proper notification of suit
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-01-04
Santa Ysabel, CA
Attempted to collect wrong amount
Complaint: The amounts filed on the attached vary from their {$11000.00} balance. I have been paying {$400.00} a month for 7 months and there is about a {$1000.00} discrepancy between their balance and mine. The interest rate is also higher than daily rate disclosed on the attached paperwork.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-12-30
Monrovia, CA
Debt was paid
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-11-15
Tacoma, WA
Not given enough info to verify debt
Complaint: Suttell, Hammer XXXX XXXX collection agency submitted judgement to court in 2004 for supposedly on account we had with XXXX XXXX, in the amount of {$7700.00}, at 12.0000 % interest. Since 2004 they have been garnishing my pay for this. After 11 years you would think this has been paid off a while ago. We have noticed for years they will start and stop garnishment. Never sending us any kind of accountability how much was taken out or balance owing. Every XXXX they start garnishing my wages for a month or so, then it stops. We never hear from them again until they start a new writ the end of XXXX. We get paperwork in the mail. Also enclosed is a Wage Garnishment Exemption Claim, stating we have 28 days/4 weeks to respond. They never give us a chance to respond, because they have already submitted collections to my payroll. We see what they are doing. They are taking so much out, leaving a balance to keep adding interest on for a year then send to payroll for collections. Why ca n't after each time they take money from me, I get a balance from them so I can go ahead and pay in full? When I got this on Thursday, I called and asked this question and nobody wants to respond to this. They are nickel and finding me. I called XXXX years ago and was told this account had been written off many years ago and they have no record of payments. I called and told XXXX this and they told me it does not matter and when I had asked for contact to XXXX they would not give to me. I had to find contact myself. I feel after 11 years of supposedly paying off a {$7700.00} debt this should have been paid off a long time ago. We feel they are taking advantage and just trying to get as much money from us as they can.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-11-03
WA
Contacted me instead of my attorney
Complaint: I received a summons for a lawsuit after I disputed the debt. I had my attorney send a letter stating that I did not owe the debt and why and they responding directly to me, not my attorney. They proceeded in filing a lawsuit directly against me instead of my attorney. They also refused to provide a physical address so they could be served.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-11-03
WA
Not given enough info to verify debt
Complaint: I received threatening phone calls and letters plus a lawsuit was filed, when I disputed the claim to debt. They are not the original debtor and their information is wrong. They did not provide me with enough information and threatened to take action if I did n't respond within 30 days. They refuse to give me their street address when I phone them so that I can have them served. They were very rude on the phone and would not provide information.
Company Response: Closed with explanation