SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC

Consumer Complaints

There are over 9109 complaints on file for SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. Dated between 2019-12-06 and 2012-02-28.

Complaints Page 233

2015-08-04

Marina Del Rey, CA

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-08-04

Berkeley, NJ

Disclosure verification of debt

Debt collection: Mortgage

Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-08-04

Fort Lauderdale, FL

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-08-04

Fort Lauderdale, FL

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-08-04

Friendswood, TX

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional fixed mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with non-monetary relief

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-08-04

Cheverly, MD

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: FHA mortgage


Complaint: my mortgage was sold or transferred to another company without any notice to me. I called today our mortgage servicing company ( SPS Inc. ) ( XXXX/XXXX/15 to make the monthly payment and was told that it was no longer with them ( SPS INC ) I was told it was now with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, when I called XXXX I was told there was no loan with them. I called SPS back and was told that a letter was sent to me on XXXX/XXXX/15 we never received any letter from them or a letter from XXXX saying they now have our mortgage. On XXXX XXXX I called SPC Inc. spoke with our case manager XXXX XXXX, to inform SPS that I changed home owner insurance and wanted to inform them of the new company I was never told that our mortgage was transferred to another company. I received our loan statement dated XXXX/XXXX/15 for the XX/XX/2015 payment ( see attached ) the post mark on the envelope is dated, XXXX/XXXX/15. why would SPS send us a statement requesting payment to them for XXXX/XXXX/15?, SPS ; states that a letter was sent to us on XXXX/XXXX/15 saying our account was transferred to XXXX?? we never received a letter from SPS to this date nor have we received any correspondence from this so called XXXX XXXX. my complaint is, is it legal to do business this way?. Just who do we pay our mortgage to? we are trying to establish our credit status to apply for a VA loan this can do harm to our credit worthiness ( this is a FHA loan ) please help us resolve this issue. thanking you for your prompt response to this matter.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-08-04

Hempstead, NY

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Company Response: Company chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-08-03

San Pedro, CA

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional fixed mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-08-03

Key Biscayne, FL

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional fixed mortgage


Complaint: 1. On XX/XX/XXXX the XXXX County Court entered a Final Judgment of foreclosure setting a sale date for XX/XX/XXXX. 2. On or about XXXX XXXX, XXXX I applied for a Loan Modification to the servicer Select Portfolio Servicing ( SPS ). 3. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, because of my application SPS filed a motion to cancel sale. 4. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX at a hearing, the Court entered an order cancelling the foreclosure sale on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 5. I kept been sending requested information to SPS. On XXXX different occasions I received letters stating the SPS had received a complete Assistance Review Applications. But, I never received information as to the outcome of their evaluation in violation of Regulation X, 12 C.F.R. 1024.41 ( c ) ( 1 ) ( ii ), even though they stated in their communications that I would get an answer in 30 days. 6. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX the servicer SPS filed a motion to schedule a foreclosure sale, thus starting " Dual Tracking '' in violation of federal law Regulation X, 12 C.F.R. 1024.41 ( g ), since they had not responded to my modification application. 7. The foreclosure sale date was set for XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 8. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX because my modification was still been processed SPS filed a motion to cancel the sale on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 9. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX at a hearing, the Court entered an order cancelling the sale. 10. The foreclosure sale was rescheduled for XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 11. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX because my modification was still been processed SPS filed a motion to cancel sale on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 12. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX at a hearing, the court entered an order cancelling the foreclosure sale on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 13. The sale was rescheduled for XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 14. At last, On XXXX XXXX, XXXX and about eleven months after my modification application SPS responded to my modification application for the first time with a denial using an incorrect gross income. Corrections were made and on XXXX XXXX, XXXX a XXXX denial of my modification was issued in spite of the fact that I demonstrated to them that I make more than {$4000.00} a month which is enough to start paying my mortgage. 15. The fact that SPS thru their lawyer has pleaded to cancel the sale so many times without giving me an answer to my modification application demonstrate their violation of Regulation X, 12 C.F.R. 1024.41 ( c ) ( 1 ) ( ii ) and Regulation X, 12 C.F.R. 1024.41 ( g ). 16. The court could have sold my property at any of those scheduled hearings. 17. On or about XXXX XXXX, XXXX I applied for the HAFA program. First SPS considered me to for a cash for keys program. Then I was considered for a Deed in Lieu. In both cases SPS denied the XXXX options and decided to offer me the short sale option. 18. On about XXXX XXXX, XXXX I signed a contract with a realtor to work on the short sale. 19. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX in view of my application for a short sale, SPS filed a motion to cancel the sale on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 20. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX Once again, the court postponed the sale for XXXX XXXX, XXXX. This happened only because I had a copy of a short sale contract that my realtor had prepared. The SPS lawyer had no evidence to present to the court. 21. A week later or so, SPS rejected the short sale contract that my realtor had sent to them. 22. At the present time my realtor is diligently working to offer another short sale contract. 23. SPS as anybody that knows a little about real estate transactions knows that no short sale is going to be completed in the amount of time left before XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 24. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX there is not going to be more postponement and the court is going to sell my home to the highest bidder. 25. Regulation X was enacted to exactly stop the kind of behavior that SPS has displayed in my case, in which they have violated many times Regulation X, 12 C.F.R. 1024.41 ( c ) ( 1 ) ( ii ) and Regulation X, 12 C.F.R. 1024.41 ( g ).
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-08-03

Miami, FL

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-08-02

Tucson, AZ

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional fixed mortgage


Complaint: Mine and my husbands mortgage has been sold a few times in a couple of years. We have been trying to refinance for a few years now. We were with XXXX XXXX Loans until XXXX 2015 when they sold our mortgage to SPS Select Portfolio Servicing and that is when the trouble started. When we were with XXXX we fell behind a month and we were trying to get it paid back but because my husband lost some income and a few unforeseen bills we were unable to catch it up. When SPS took over our mortgage we had explained the issues we were having but they did not care did not want to hear about it. I tried to go thru a hardship with them but when XXXX of the people there started telling me what documents they needed I started to ask questions. She then said they needed a copy of our bank statement and I said to verify our income right and she said " NO WE NEED TO SEE WHERE YOUR MONEY IS GOING TO ''. I said that where our money goes is really none of their business she said well we need it. I would not send them anything after that. In the middle of XXXX I called SPS to try to make arrangements for the Payment for XXXX which I did set up and the person I was speaking with said that if I made a half of the payment we were behind they would put it aside in our account until we could make the XXXX then we would be caught up. A couple of weeks after that I received a letter from SPS saying that we were three XXXX XXXX ) payments behind and they were going to forclose on us. I called them and the gentleman I spoke to said that they did not receive a payment for XXXX when I ask why I was just now hearing about it he really had no answer now where they are coming up with three payments I have NO idea. We knew we were behind XXXX ( XXXX ) payment but where they came up with XXXX we do not know. We were told to contact you to see if you could handle this for us. We have been trying to do a refi on our house for a couple of years now we do n't qualify for harp because we are upside down. We are paying 8.5 % interest and no one wants to help us. I think SPS is trying to just take our home. We are a family of XXXX our XXXX daughter is XXXX and lives at home with us and I do n't know what I would do with her if we lost our home. I was told that XXXX XXXX Loans sold our mortgage because they were afraid that they were going to get in trouble for being a Predatory Lender. Please help. Thank You
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-08-01

Royal Palm Beach, FL

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with non-monetary relief

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-07-31

Hanford, CA

False statements or representation

Debt collection: Mortgage

Impersonated an attorney or official
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-07-31

Brentwood, NC

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Company Response: Company chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-07-31

Royal Palm Beach, FL

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with non-monetary relief

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-07-31

CA

Deposits and withdrawals

Bank account or service: Other bank product/service


Complaint: My guest trailer/camper burned down XXXX 2014. Insurance paid out XXXX dollars. I have spent about {$60000.00} in clearing, demolition, and rebuilding to date. SPS my mortgage lender has paid out {$29000.00}. Now the County has tagged my property for various violations and the DA is threatening Jail time if violations are not fixed in a timely manner. I have reported this to SPS and filed all paper work for proper reimbursement. How ever SPS has been stalling for the last two months and I could end up in jail. Please help
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-07-31

Hinkley, CA

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Complaint: I applied for assistance in saving my home and was denied assistance back in XXXX 2015. My servicer is SPS and I believe they were missing some of my income as the amount they used in that review seems incorrect. I have recently submitted updated financial information via my attorney ( XXXX XXXX, 2015 XXXX and I believe I qualify for a loan modification to save my home. However, SPS has set a sale date on my property for XXXX XXXX, 2015. I am worried they will not post phone my sale date and I am asking for the help of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in asking them to allow me to be reviewed for assistance.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with non-monetary relief

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-07-30

Charleston, OR

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-07-30

Hon, HI

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Complaint: I applied for a loan modification and was denied based on the wrong income. ( see attached ) Due to a calendaring oversight, my appeal -- which was based solely on the servicer 's error -- was one day late. The letter was dated XXXX XXXX, and I was supposed to reply within 30 days of the date of the letter. I did n't receive the letter until XXXX XXXX. The servicer refused to consider my appeal on XXXX XXXX ( due on XXXX XXXX ) even though it was their mistake in the first place. I provided income documentation and proof of the rental and boarder income I receive. One portion of the income is from boarders who co-occupy my portion of the building I live in and own. This is the only income I was given credit for, {$2000.00} a month. The income from the rest of the building, {$4900.00}, is currently paid to the court-appointed foreclosure commissioner. Between the date of the foreclosure judgment and the foreclosure sale, the commissioner told my tenants they were to pay him. No sale date has been set, and the foreclosure was on hold while my loan modification was being reviewed, but the commissioner kept the rents. The servicer did not give me credit for the rents, even though I provided proof from the commissioner that he was receiving the money. See attached. I do not think it is fair to deny me a chance to be considered for a loan modification, because of a one-day oversight to make an appeal I was making based only because of the servicer 's mistake on my income. I am represented by an attorney and my attorney is helping me file this complaint.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-07-30

Lk Buena Vis, FL

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Complaint: Back in XXXX or XXXX I filed a compliant in ref to my mortage company Slect Portfolio Servicing, after the complaint was filed thatnks to you 's I was able to get a modification with was suppose to tart new payments on XXXX XXXX, According to them they sent me some papers in which needed my signature and I was suppose to fax and mail papers back to them, according to them those papers were sent and they were calling to se if I had fax & mail them back to them, I explained to Rep that as of that day I had n't received there papers rep informed me that they will send new papers out and that as soon I received them I was suppose to fax & mail them back to them, papers arrived 6 days later and as I was told they where sign, fax and mailed a couple of dayslater I received a call from them I which I was told that paper work was not received and they want to know why, I explained to rep that papers were sign, fax and mail and according to them they had not received them I told rep that I had made copies and that I will refax and mail my cpies to them she stated that they will arrive late and that she will see what can be done but that since it was just XXXX days later she did n't think it would be a problem she will let me know.I waited a couple of days then I received a call from them letting me know that nothing could be done if I wanted they could send me a new set of papers so I could start from scrath and see what happens a couple of weeks ago I received a letter from the court stating that my home once again was in foreclosure again and the date will be XXXX, I received their paper work I completed it mail it express mail, I received a call and was inform they had received papers but that they can not submit a hold on the forclosure because papers have to be reviewed and then they can submit a hold, I take responsibility for papers being later due to the fact that they were sent to me late but what am I going to do now, my case # was XXXX.Please let me know what can be done now to see how can this be fit.Thank you XXXX Bless
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-07-29

Bethany, IN

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-07-29

IN

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: Conventional fixed mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-07-29

Tarzana, CA

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2015-07-28

Carrollwood, FL

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with non-monetary relief

Disputed: No Timely Response

2015-07-28

Kenner, LA

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: VA mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response


© 2025 intlbanking.org | Privacy Policy