SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC

Consumer Complaints

There are over 9109 complaints on file for SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. Dated between 2019-12-06 and 2012-02-28.

Complaints Page 183

2016-06-15

Seligman, AZ

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: Conventional fixed mortgage


Complaint: The copy of the deed of trust that Select Portfolio Servicing ( " SPS '' ) has provided to me references a promissory note signed by both myself and my spouse and none of the copies of the promissory note that SPS has provided were signed by my spouse. See attached letters dated XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, XXXX/XXXX/XXXX and XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. To date, despite only being able to provide copies of an invalid deed of trust, SPS has refused to provide any explanation as to what authority it has to proceed with the trustee sale currently scheduled for XXXX/XXXX/XXXX.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2016-06-15

Evington, VA

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-14

Redondo Beach, CA

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-14

Newnan, GA

Other

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-14

Woodbury, PA

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional fixed mortgage


Complaint: I am assisting my aunt with a short sale on her home. Her loan is being serviced with a company called Select Portfolio Servicing XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, UT XXXX ). She has been working to get this resolved since XXXX of XXXX, and has now submitted her 3rd offer. All XXXX offers have been equal to or greater than the XXXX value. Everytime an offer is submitted my aunt is required to send new documents. Everytime we call and ask if all information has been received, and they say yes. Then we call back for a status and they state they need someting else. Then the original documents expire and we have to submit again and reapply. We keep going in circles. After we lost the first XXXX buyers I called and complained to the Ombudsman office. They assured me that this time would be different and that they had everything needed. However when I called in for status, they again are asking for something additional that was not requested initally. We are getting no where and now time is running out as foreclosure is moving forward. We have a current cash offer for fair market value and we can not get an answer. The current XXXX is going to expire on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX and they still have not submitted the offer to the investor. Please help.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2016-06-13

Hempstead, NY

Communication tactics

Debt collection: Mortgage

Frequent or repeated calls
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-13

Alta, CA

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: Conventional fixed mortgage


Complaint: Request SPS to provide the following items to me ( this has been ongoing since they became the mortgage servicer since XXXX XXXX XXXX ) 1.written explanation why my property tax ( 1st installment due XXXX/XXXX/XXXX ) was paid late XXXX XXXX which incurred a penalty from the State of California ( $ XXXX est. ) which as of today has never been provided after 5 requests through letters and faxes 2.request for my impound account that pays my property tax and fire insurance be terminated and have the mortgage note modified to reflect the principal and interest payment without the impound..sent two letters as well as a fax letter and no response in writing from SPS as of today date 3.request a written explanation of why there is a escrow shortage for the tax and fire insurance impound since it is being added to the principal and interest payment and how did this occur..request three times via letters fax to their customer service account supervisor XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX without result . last two months to date. Please have SPS comply to my written requests without further delay. I have been in contact with them long enough toi realize that it is a total waste of time and energy without your help to force them to comply.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-12

Chantilly, VA

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-11

Westland, MI

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-10

San Francisco, CA

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2016-06-10

San Bruno, CA

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-10

Las Vegas, NV

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-10

CA

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Complaint: Select Portfolio Servicing at XXXX Account Number XXXX On XX/XX/XXXX, I signed papers to turn a house, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Md, XXXX to this lender under their deed in lieu of foreclosure program. I signed the deed in front of a notary with an attorney reviewing the papers. They wanted the house available as of XX/XX/XXXX. The property manager, XXXX XXXX, XXXX had everything ready for them and no-one showed. They have since missed several appointments and treated the property manager very unprofessionally. But the house is sitting empty all this time and things are happening. The company gave me tax forms stating that the house was transferred in XX/XX/XXXX and I filed those forms with the state of Maryland and the Federal government with my tax return under the advice of a CPA. But the company still has not taken the keys from the property manager and expects me to keep up the vacant house. It has been over six years for this servicer to make up its mind about the house. Even filling out and signing the deed has not gotten rid of this house even though I had it broom clean on the day they asked me. Back when I was going through the loan modification process, they told you I did not file the papers, but that assertion was incorrect. They continued processing the modification after they told you I had not completed the process correctly and later turned down the loan modificiation. Now they wanted to take the house but expect me to keep it up after I signed the deed over to them and filed my tax return with their information.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2016-06-10

Grant, FL

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2016-06-10

Franklin Lks, NJ

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: Conventional fixed mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2016-06-09

TX

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: Conventional fixed mortgage


Complaint: For over seven years we have been trying to get our loan payment lowered to where we can stay in our home. Until XXXX, 2015 our loan payment was over our income. In 2015 our payment was lowered to approximately {$1300.00} dollars but it was still 70 % of our income. We can not afford that payment and also have had to invest money into our property because it was deteriorating. This has been making it hard plus many health issues that we have had. All we want is for our servicer to lower our payments to something reasonable and affordable. Every time they have helped us the loan modification was an in-house, which resulted in our loan balance now being at {$360000.00}, when the origination amount was {$230000.00}. This is a greater than a {$130000.00} difference. We were solicited at least three times resulting in these in-house loan modifications. We are preparing a summary of the history of these loan modifications and the solicitation letters we received. We currently try to get a loan modification every chance we get, and we get turned down with a letter telling us we have no loan mitigation options. Every time this happens to us, we get harassing phone calls from the servicer trying to get us to sell our home or turn our property over to them. They say that obviously the home is not affordable to us, but when we compare what is being offered in home mortgages in the market place to our situation we know that our home would be affordable if the servicer had not ruined our credit. We have now asked the servicer to comply with RESPA laws regarding answering our questions that we have asked repeatedly before. We are attaching the last letter we sent to our servicer. We waited to see if we would get response from them within 5 days regarding our Qualified Written Request before we forwarded this letter to CFPB. We hope, with help from the CFPB, we will get some results on a loan modification that will give us a payment that we can afford. We do n't care if they even raise our mortgage balance again ; we just need to have payments that we can make on time.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2016-06-09

Canyon Cntry, CA

Application, originator, mortgage broker

Mortgage: Conventional fixed mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-09

Las Vegas, NV

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-08

La Verne, CA

Application, originator, mortgage broker

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-08

Alta Loma, CA

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Other mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-08

Bronx, NY

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: Home equity loan or line of credit


Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-08

Stantonville, TN

Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed

Debt collection: Mortgage

Debt is not mine
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: Yes Timely Response

2016-06-08

Oxford, GA

Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Complaint: On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, I incurred a financial obligation when I purchased my home located at XXXX , GA XXXX for the amount of {$180000.00}. The loan was evidenced by a Note, naming XXXX as the " Lender. '' Sometimes thereafter, my Security Deed was assigned to Select Portfolio Servicing. I, however, was not provided any notices of the purported assignment, sale or transfer of the servicing of the loan to Select Portfolio Servicing. I began to have difficulty meeting my obligation during the housing market collapse. In an attempt to save my home, I 've made various efforts to get an affordable loan modification from Select Portfolio Servicing. All attempts, however, were unsuccessful. It appears that they refuse to give me a reasonable workout option and is bent on taking my home. Because I questioned Select Portfolio Servicing 's servicing of my loan and how credits had been applied and whether or not my loan account is actually in default, on XXXX XXXX, XXXX I forwarded to Select Portfolio Servicing a Qualified Written Requests ( QWRs ) requesting that Select Portfolio Servicing provide me with ( 1 ) A complete audit history from alleged loan origination, showing the dates payments were applied, and to what internal accounts ( i.e. principal, interest, suspense, escrow, etc. ) payments were applied ; ( 2 ) A complete and itemized statement of all advances or charges against this account ; and ( 3 ) A complete and itemized statement of the escrow for this account, if any, from the date of the note origination to the date of your response to this letter. Also, my QWR stated that it was my belief that my loan account has been improperly serviced in that credits for payments made by me had not been applied to my mortgage loan account. Select Portfolio Servicing, however, did not respond to my QWR, took no responsive action and undertook no investigation into the issues raised by my QWR. The only way to ensure the integrity of my loan and whether my account has been properly credited is for Select Portfolio Servicing to produce a verified accounting in compliance with RESPA 2605 ( e ).
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-07

Oak Lawn, IL

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response

2016-06-07

Stockbridge, GA

Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Mortgage: Conventional fixed mortgage


Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation

Disputed: No Timely Response


© 2025 intlbanking.org | Privacy Policy