There are over 5340 complaints on file for NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION. Dated between 2019-12-16 and 2011-12-05.
2015-10-29
Virginia Bch, VA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-29
Tulsa, OK
Company Response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error Closed with explanation
2015-10-28
Silver Spring, MD
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-28
Houston, TX
Talked to a third party about my debt
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-28
Springfield, VA
Complaint: defrauded out of XXXX bywire transfer fraud/ scam.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-26
VA
Complaint: On XX/XX/XXXX I purchased a XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX VIN XXXX from XXXX at XXXX XXXX XXXX, in XXXX Virginia. The Buyers Order and vehicle indicated that the vehicle had XXXX miles. When I tried to check its value for trade-in at XXXX, they provided a XXXX that listed a mileage discrepancy and placed the actual mileage at over XXXX thousands miles. The dealership advertises as a XXXX XXXX member. I was provided an AutoCheck history that did not reveal the mileage problem. Based on the XXXX the vehicle has a - {$280.00} ( NEGATIVE ) value. The vehicle was financed with NFCU FOR {$12000.00}. I think that the dealership knowingly misrepresented the mileage in the transaction as they had access to the XXXX documents. They submitted the false information to NFCU for a loan.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-23
Glen Burnie, MD
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-22
Lemoore, CA
Company Response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error Closed with explanation
2015-10-22
Salton City, CA
Complaint: I recently purchased a Cadillac CTS at the XXXX XXXX in XXXX XXXX. They gave me a temporary registration and I believed the documentation to be legitimate. On the temporary registration the mileage was listed as XXXX miles, the actual mileage of the vehicle was XXXX miles. When I went to the XXXX to receive my permanent registration the XXXX informed me that the vehicle was not registered in my name and there was a lean on the title. After the XXXX, I went back to XXXX XXXX and they would not disclose the information that I needed. Later on XXXX legal informed me that the vehicle was stolen.
Company Response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company Closed with explanation
2015-10-22
Atlantic Beach, FL
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-22
Occoquan, VA
Complaint: My accounbt has been attacked by a company multiple times ( 8 ) in one day and multiple times ( 19 ) over the last few months especially. It happened also, a year ago and the compnay changed their name and did it again. There was XXXX company names that have tried to withdrawl ACH debits out of my account doing multiple times with less and less amounts at least 3 times in one day upto 8 times in one day. Each time I found out, I have called the Navy Federal Credit Union and they tell me to send in the request form to receive the return item fee charges that they have charged me each time it occurred. In the last 3 months, I have been charged {$550.00} in return items costs. I have faxed in the forms, and they tell me they did n't receive them. I went into the branch on XXXX XXXX, 2015 and they filled out XXXX forms for the charges and turned them into the deptartment that handles that amount. They refunded me {$200.00} and told me they were not going to give me the rest. I worked with XXXX and he said that he would get me the funds back, but now, on Monday XXXX XXXX, 2015, he said they ca n't. I then requested the reason for denying me in writing and they have refused. I went into the Branch again on Tuesday XXXX XXXX, 2015 and spoke with the Branch manager, XXXX XXXX at the XXXX, VA XXXX and when I requested again in wrting for the refusal to refund me the fees that they took from my account for a fraudulant company trying to ACH debit my account repeatedly after I had made numerous calls and attmepts to stop this, she said they were still researching it and it would take upto 3 weeks, if they determine to give me the fees back. I requested the elecutronic transmisions from all the attempts made on my account and she told me that there is n't anything to give me. When I told her that they needed to abide by the Regulation E. Electronic Fund Transfer Act, and return the fees to me, because I never authoized that company ( s ) to debit my account, she told me that the law did n't protect consumers against the fees incurred by the fraudulent attempts on my accout. I have re-read the law, and it clearly outlines protection for consumers against the bank fees that are incurred with fraudulent debits. They clearly felt I had fraud against my account ( by returning {$200.00} into my account ), but are refusing to refund me all that was incurred ( another {$340.00} ) with these transactions. I have notified them via, phone, fax and in person, as soon as I knew about the attempted debits starting in XXXX 2015, but they still refuse to follow the law. I really would like someone to make sure that they do n't continue to act as though no one can make them follow the law and enforce regulation on them. I want the rest of the fees of {$340.00} returned back to me asap.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with monetary relief
2015-10-21
Chipley, FL
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with monetary relief
2015-10-18
Great Bend, NY
Company Response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error Closed with non-monetary relief
2015-10-18
Bellaire, TX
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-16
Ocoee, FL
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-16
NY
Complaint: My sister has removed money from her N.F.C.U. account without her permission or mine. I was wondering why they can not put a hold on the account where she put the money and to take LARGE sums of money without check with me or my mother?? She has removed about {$72000.00} from my mom 's accout without permission and they are saying she has the legal right!!! I will sign any papers you wish to check her accounts like a lawyer would make me sign to check accounts!!
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-16
East Orange, NJ
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-15
Lillington, NC
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with non-monetary relief
2015-10-14
Silver Spring, MD
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-14
Breidablick, WA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-14
Patterson, MD
Complaint: I have been unable to use my account due to fraudlent activity because of identity theft i spoke with the fraud dept awhile ago to get it resolved nothing has yet to be done
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-14
Country Lakes, FL
Debt is not mine
Company Response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error Closed with explanation
2015-10-10
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2015-10-09
Hampton, VA
Company Response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company Closed with explanation
2015-10-08
Gloucester City, NJ
Information is not mine
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation