There are over 306 complaints on file for McCarthy, Burgess Wolff, Inc.. Dated between 2019-12-12 and 2013-08-01.
2016-10-27
Yorba Linda, CA
Debt was paid
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-10-12
Madison, WI
Frequent or repeated calls
Company Response: Company believes complaint represents an opportunity for improvement to better serve consumers Closed with explanation
2016-10-05
Aurora, CO
Debt is not mine
Company Response: Company believes complaint represents an opportunity for improvement to better serve consumers Closed with explanation
2016-09-29
Manhattan, NY
Debt was paid
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-09-27
East View, NY
Frequent or repeated calls
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-09-27
Addisleigh Park, NY
Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-09-25
Royal Palm Beach, FL
Debt is not mine
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-09-21
Lockhart, FL
Called outside of 8am-9pm
Company Response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error Closed with explanation
2016-09-20
Albion, NY
Debt is not mine
Complaint: My client, XXXX XXXX, was a low level employee of the XXXX XXXX for XXXX XXXX in the New Hampshire officeXXXX XXXX was instructed by the XXXX to create an internet account with XXXX XXXX for the exclusive use of the XXXX. Thereafter, he called XXXX XXXX, used the XXXX 's credit card for payment of all fees, including future charges, and provided his name and phone number as XXXX required a contact person.
Shortly thereafter, XXXX left the XXXX New Hampshire campaign. Over the past several weeks, XXXX has been hounded by an abusive debt collector even though she was apprised of the above facts. XXXX then contacted my office to represent him in this matter. On XXXX XXXX, 2016, a representative from McCarthy. Burgess and Wolfe contacted me, at first refusing to identify themselves. When I informed the McCarthy, Burgess and Wolfe ( hereinafter, MB & W ) representative to either identify herself or I would end the call she stated that the call would be recorded and that she was calling in response to a claim against XXXX XXXX. I informed the MB & W representative of the facts set forth above, told her my Client had no fiduciary responsibility for the Campaign and was no longer employed by XXXX and that she was to discontinue efforts to collect through my Client. She continued to press for information and I informed her that the debt was not my Client 's, he was not responsible and that she was to discontinue all efforts to collect through my Client. Lastly, I told her that should they initiate any proceeding against my Client, we would countersue. Thereafter, I ended the call.
Previously, I informed MB & W of the above facts and informed them that XXXX XXXX would not be responsible for the debt as it was not his, and they were to discontinue all collection efforts through XXXX. I also told MB & W that if they had facts to counter my claims, they were to send those fact directly to me and discontinue all communications with my Client.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-09-16
NV
Not given enough info to verify debt
Complaint: Company sent me an email to XXXX telling me to contact their office for information related to a debt. I never received communication from them in the mail with information with regards to whom the original creditor is, the amount owed, and notification of my rights to dispute the debt.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-09-15
Kingman, AZ
Threatened to take legal action
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-08-22
South Florida, FL
Contacted me after I asked not to
Complaint: I cancelled a phone line which was ported to a new provider. Former telephone company refused to close account for months. I receive 1st collection letter which I timely disputed. Collection continues to contact me with following written communication which states : " All I can do is explain the alternative to you. From there, you have to determine whether the potential cost in time or otherwise, is worhwhile. Let me reiterate-the choice is yours ''.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-08-20
Ft Wayne, IN
Called after sent written cease of comm
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-08-11
Lydick, IN
Contacted employer after asked not to
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-08-07
Dallas, TX
Called after sent written cease of comm
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-07-20
Ehrhardt, SC
Debt was paid
Complaint: XX/XX/XXXX, I filed for Chapter XXXX Bankruptcy. All of my creditors were notified and, payments were made through the XXXX Trustee to all of my creditors. My bankruptcy was discharged/dismissed in XXXX XXXX. Today, XXXX XXXX, I received a phone call from McCarthy, Burgess, and Wolff, indicating that they were calling to collect a debt. A friend of mine also received a letter, addressed to me, from this company. I no longer reside at the XXXX location with my friend, but nonetheless, my friend notified me of the letter. The letter stated that they were collecting a debt from XXXX. I have documentation from the XXXX Trustee that XXXX was paid off through my bankruptcy. XXXX requires written request of pay off verification for which I can request to be sent directly to this company and/or XXXX from the XXXX Trustee. The letter from McCarthy, Burgess, and Wolf stated that the debt was " verified '', however, this is impossible given that the XXXX Trustee has already paid the debt on my behalf and I no longer owe. XXXX is also not reporting any debt to them on my credit reports. This company is attempting to collect debt from me that I do not owe.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-07-14
Coalinga, CA
Debt was paid
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-06-20
Tempe, AZ
Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-06-16
Edison, NJ
Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-05-24
Milford, CT
Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-05-19
Redding, CA
Used obscene/profane/abusive language
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-05-18
Simpsonville, SC
Talked to a third party about my debt
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-05-17
Belle Haven, CT
Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-05-02
PA
Debt resulted from identity theft
Complaint: I filed a complaint against XXXX XXXX for attempting to collect charges made on my charge account that were fraudulent. XXXX XXXX sent me a letter notifying me the account was re opened and was going to be investigated. Friday I received a letter from XXXX XXXX stating I closed my claim against them and I have agreed to pay the bill. This is not true. I called the number listed on the letter and stated to XXXX that I did not authorize this action. I filled out the paperwork denying the action and faxed it to the number provided. Today I received a letter from a debt collection agency on behalf of XXXX XXXX / XXXX XXXX and last Thursday I was contacted by a debt collection company trying to collect this debt.
We are not finished with my open claim. I did not make the charges. We have an open investigation. I am waiting for resolution of this issue. It seems XXXX is railroading me to pay this debt.
In closing, this claim has not been retracted and XXXX XXXX did not perform their due diligence. This matter was not looked into, the case was opened and nothing else was accomplished on their end. While under investigation this debt is on hold. I do not NOT make the charges not EVER open this account.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2016-04-29
Falmouth, VA
Called after sent written cease of comm
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation