There are over 39408 complaints on file for CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION. Dated between 2019-12-11 and 2011-12-01.
2016-05-11
Patterson, MD
Complaint: Both of my capitol one credit card accounts are restricted. I can not get a reason why nor have this restriction lifted so I can use my cards.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-11
Penn Yan, NY
Complaint: In reviewing my most recent Capitalone statement it came to my attention that, though the beginning balance on my statement was {$5000.00} and I made payments during the statement period totalling {$4400.00} leaving a remaining balance of {$630.00}, I was charged over {$100.00} in interest for that period. I saw on the statement that the amount that was used to calculate the interest was {$5400.00}, which made no sense to me.
When I called to inquire and ask why the interest was calculated on that amount rather than the {$630.00} that represented the remaining balance, XXXX ( laughing ) told me that the interest is based on the " average daily balance '' inclusive of new purchases? I asked her when this changed as I have had this account and used it regularly for nine months, have always followed the same pattern of paying as I go with this account and have never paid any amount of interest before. Continuing to laugh, she said she would refund the {$100.00} and make a note in the file. I advised her that in all my years of using credit cards, not XXXX company has ever charged interest on new purchases before the statement is even issued. She continued to laugh and I advised her that I would be contacting you with a complaint. She laughed again. I told her I was happy she was having so much fun on her job. I think it 's time to close this account as I have been hearing this company has not been treating consumers fairly. Now that I have had my own experience, I believe it 's a good idea.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-11
Elwyn, PA
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Garrett Park, MD
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Bethesda, MD
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Garrett Park, MD
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Havertown, PA
Debt is not mine
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Georgetown, TX
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Ashburn, VA
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Spfld, OH
Complaint: I am a victim of identity theft and I have advised the company the account was opened by the person that stole my identity. After several attempts of disputing this with the credit bureaus and contacting them directly they still say I am the one that opened the account which is completely false. I have requested copies of all documentation on the account and they have failed to provide this information. I am currently working with a lawyer to resolve this issue as well. I just need to clear my name from this company.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Key Biscayne, FL
Complaint: This bank voluntarily undertook to lend me money but the lending was not accomplished with due care and increased the risk of harm to me through ( 1 ) an inability to access the proper amount of funds to properly grow my business of providing legal services particularly on or about XXXX XXXX, XXXX which is when I filed for Chapter XXXX bankruptcy ( which was dismissed ) and after the XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX Supreme Court order of suspension from the practice of law ( which I am challenging ) but at which time a proper amount of loan funds would have allowed me to redirect my law practice to potential customers in XXXX and XXXX ( as my law licenses in XXXX and XXXX is valid ) as well as ( 2 ) through the negative mark on my credit reports and presumably resulted in harm to others who would have benefited from my business of providing legal services ( or at least the lower cost of legal services gained by more competition in the marketplace ). The reliance upon the undertaking conferred a duty of reasonable care by the bank because it thereby created a foreseeable zone of risk. See XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX v. XXXX, XXXX So. XXXX XXXX, XXXX ( XXXX XXXX ) ( " Voluntarily undertaking to do an act that if not accomplished with due care might increase the risk of harm to others or might result in harm to others due to their reliance upon the undertaking confers a duty of reasonable care, because it thereby 'creates a foreseeable zone of risk. ' XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) ; '' ).
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Brentwood, TN
Complaint: I underwent a refinance with CapitalOne last XXXX. During this process my home came in at a value less than expected, and I indicated that the loan offer was thus not very attractive to me. The loan officer then told me he would work on it, and I was presented with a final calculation of escrow plus payment that came to {$990.00}, less than what I was currently paying. However, he did not inform me at the time that in order to reach that calculation my escrow was only partially funded, leaving me with a negative balance that I had to make up. My mortgage payment just jumped to {$1100.00}, which exceeds my previous payment. Given that a loan officer would know that partial funding of an escrow would result in this jump, and given that I was never informed that this jump would take place ( my taxes and insurance would likely remain roughly the same, so these costs could easily be anticipated ), I believe the loan was crafted to present an artificially low payment to entice me to take the offer. It did beat other offers, and I selected this packaged based on this monthly payment. I believe that by not informing me of what would happen, it created this low payment, securing my contract, and left me as the consumer to pay a higher cost later to CaptialOne 's benefit. This was a very unethical business practice, for the loan officer did not tell me this would happen, nor was I informed at signing what would occur. I was just told " this is your payment. ''
Company Response: Closed with monetary relief
2016-05-10
Lexington, NC
Right to dispute notice not received
Complaint: Despite many attempts, the bank continues to report incorrectly to the credit bureaus an account that was closed. The bank refused to acknowledge that the account was reported as charged off when a payment had been made before the anticipated date of to prevent to prevent a charge off classification. Although I tried many times to have the record corrected the bank refused.
I gave up trying to get the bank to correct the record. Later, the bank offered a discounted pay off which was supposed to eliminate the charge off status and replace it by account settled at less than the book balance. The bank agreed to eliminate the charge off code. I made all the agreed payments but the bank did not change anything.
I contacted the bank again to let them know about the error in the credit report. The bank sent me a letter indicating that changes have been made ; however, my credit report continues to report the account as charged off and now also as settled for less than the book balance. The bank used unfair and deceptive practices to encourage payments and then does not comply with the terms agreed at the time of the collection call and to continues to affect the customer 's credit despite an earlier resolution. My statement can be demonstrated by the recorded conversation the bank always makes on all collection calls.
I am asking the bank to remove the charged off code. I am hoping that the bank would not deny now that there is recorded conversation. If they do, that is a false representation ; which they probably follow by asking me that if I have written evidence of the conversation to send it to them. Obviously, it impossible to comply with that request and they know it, but they do have it the evidence required and always refuse to produce it.
Your cooperation is appreciated XXXX XXXX
Company Response: Closed with non-monetary relief
2016-05-10
Lewiston, NY
Called after sent written cease of comm
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
Chef Menteur, LA
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
Antonia, MO
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
East Rockaway, NY
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
Humble, TX
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
Orlando, FL
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
Tulsa, OK
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
Columbus, OH
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
Quartzsite, AZ
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
Dunnellon, FL
Complaint: The fraud department has had our business credit card accounts on hold for several weeks now due to payments they want to verify. Although we disagree with the fraud hold initially, we understand the need for security. What we do not understand is why the fraud hold has not been released almost 30 days after the payments were made.
The fraud department has indicated that they want to verify the payments in question by calling the banks that the payments came from. Unfortunately, XXXX of the institutions do not disclose any information about customer accounts over the phone. The capital one fraud department needs to find a better way to verify payments, and absolutely should have a means of automatically removing security holds after several weeks. In any case, I have attached statements to this complaint, and highlighted the payments showing that they have cleared. I have also attached photo ids of the account holders.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
CT
Complaint: Capital One, like most other credit card issuers, offers promotional ( often 0 % ) rates, which expire, of course, often in 12 months. However, other than their initial offer notice, Capital One DOES NOT DISCLOSE the expiration date of the offer on their mailed statements NOR online. I have enclosed my online " chat '' with XXXX representatives, who say they are " working '' on it, but declined to give even a target date to disclose this key piece of information. I find this self-serving ( to earn interest based on the forgetfulness and short term thinking of most of us consumers. The disclosure & reminder should be available, & repeatedly provided, by regulation. Thank you.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
Niantic, CT
Complaint: Capitalone is asking for a high minimum payment in the amount of XXXX, the account is past due and over limit currently, which I understand. However, they are asking for such a high amount as it almost exceeds my weekly paycheck. I requested the amount lowered, however, was denied saying the account is again over limit and past due. The account is past due because I have fallen behind on payments with the account as well as other credit accounts I currently hold. I take care of my mother and have been paying for her medication ( s ). I did make a payment in the amount of XXXX, however, a stop payment had to be placed due to insufficient funds. My paycheck amount this week is lower than usual due to a payroll discrepancy, a stop payment had to be placed as the payment was already in process.
Company Response: Closed with explanation