There are over 6232 complaints on file for ALLY FINANCIAL INC. Dated between 2019-12-16 and 2012-03-09.
2016-05-17
Orion Twp, MI
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-17
Dayton, OH
Complaint: I filed a dispute with my bank ( Ally Online ) regarding charges from a XXXX merchant that I requested be refunded. The XXXX merchant did not comply with the refund so I had resorted to disputing the charges with my bank. The date of the charges were on XXXX/XXXX/2016 and I contacted the XXXX merchant on XXXX/XXXX/2016 to tell them to refund me the full amount. I also contacted my bank that day to open a dispute about the charges just in case. The XXXX merchant confirmed that I would see the refund by XXXX/XXXX/2016 credited back to my account but by that day, only a portion of the full amount had been refunded. So I proceeded with pursuing the dispute through my bank and on XXXX/XXXX/2016 I was given a form to give a written account of the dispute. I completed and submitted the form on XXXX/XXXX/2016 and received no confirmation that the form was received by the disputes department ( using e-mail address XXXXXXXXXXXX ) and assumed they would contact me if and when they had or needed more information. Jumping ahead to XXXX/XXXX/2016 ( the date of this complaint ) I called to follow up and learn that they incorrectly closed my dispute because I said I was going to pursue the refund with the XXXX merchant directly. Not only is that false, but its stated right in my written form that this option was already pursued, unfulfilled, and that I expected the bank to pursue this route on my behalf. They did not issue the provisional credit back of the amount that I disputed within 10 business days of me submitting the complaint and they also incorrectly closed my dispute without any notice to me.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-17
Pompano Beach, FL
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-17
Chicago, IL
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with non-monetary relief
2016-05-17
Keytesville, MO
Complaint: Item is still reporting on my credit report although my ex wife took responsibility for this debt and needs to be held responsible for it. This debt is no longer mine according my divorce, which is Missouri Case Number XXXX.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-16
Panther Creek, TX
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-16
Three Bridges, NJ
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-15
Tonawanda, NY
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-14
Lewisville, TX
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-13
Barbours, PA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-13
Sanford, FL
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-12
San Luis Obispo, CA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-12
Oaklevel, VA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-12
Bedford, TX
Complaint: Ally financial continues to call and harass me after I 've already spoken with them today and come to a resolution.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-12
Lockport, NY
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-12
San Mateo, CA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with monetary relief
2016-05-11
Ashley, LA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-11
Phoenix, AZ
Complaint: The FINANCE CHARGE that Ally is charging is OUTRAGEOUS!
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Redding, CA
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Utica, NY
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Harsens Is, MI
Complaint: After turning in a lease on our Chrysler 200 that was in good condition and XXXX miles under the mileage limit we were given a bill for {$1000.00} for excess wear .... wear consisted of small scratches that the photos on the inspection report show that are diet that could be wiped off with your hand. In addition the car looked like the inspector purposely made the car dirty and even charged for a windshield Crack that was less than half an inch and repaired same day from saflight. The chip had mysteriously grown to just over the XXXX limit. Lastly the XXXX key fob was missing, which was our fault as we forgot but called ally after the fact asking if we could send it in to not be charged and they refused. We feel grossly taken advantage of and ally did nothing to even bother to consider our request to review the photos of the scratches. The only legitimate claim were scratches to the underside of the front bumper
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-10
Oxford, GA
Complaint: In XXXX 2016, Ally Financial was contacted by the Consumer regarding intentional delayed credit reporting. The Consumer discovered on XXXX/XXXX/2016 Ally Financial did fraudulently and knowingly falsify consumer credit reporting by using inaccurate balance data and the date of reporting to distort credit score increase in favor of Consumer ; Example : On XXXX/XXXX/2016 Ally Financial claims on XXXX Credit Report, the report submission date was XXXX/XXXX/2016 and the consumer auto balance was {$37000.00} which is false data for XXXX/XXXX/2016, thereby proof that 60 calendar days had elapsed as the Consumer 's balance fell to {$37000.00} as result of a XXXX/XXXX/2016 payment. From XXXX/XXXX/2016 to XXXX/XXXX/2016 Ally Financial did fraudulently, willfully, and knowingly falsify the Consumer 's XXXX Credit Report by reporting a balance of {$38000.00} ( did not happen until XXXX/XXXX/2016 ) and skipping altogether a balance of {$37000.00} ( which happened on XXXX/XXXX/2016 ). Ally Financial has intentionally used false/delayed credit reporting tactics repeatedly against the Consumer in order to intentionally mislead/depress credit score increases that occur naturally with aging of account life and decrease of balance. Further, the reasoning for the above-mentioned illegal credit reporting tactics by Ally Financial serves to delay credit score increases whereby the Consumer could either refinance the auto loan at a lower interest rate or change to another more reputable lender altogether.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
Clementon, NJ
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2016-05-09
Cottleville, MO
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with non-monetary relief
2016-05-09
Rochester, OH
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation