There are over 9109 complaints on file for SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. Dated between 2019-12-06 and 2012-02-28.
2019-05-03
Beryl, AR
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-05-03
Huntingtn Bch, CA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-05-02
Louisville, KY
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-05-02
Bessemer, AL
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-05-02
Southworth, WA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-05-02
Auburn, NJ
Impersonated attorney, law enforcement, or government official
Complaint: This is in response to Select Portfolio Servicing , INC. ( SPS ) CFPB response to complaint XXXX, dated XX/XX/XXXX. I have several issues/concerns with this response. 1- SPS never addressed the illegal trespassing on private property. 2- SPS 's alleged validation of debt is unacceptable. SPS is a servicer and/or debt collector. SPS is not the alleged note holder and has yet to provide any documentation from the alleged note holder providing proof of their security interest ; i.e. assignment documentation. 3- In the Broker 's Price Opinion ( BPO ) provided in the response by SPS , an " out building '' was used in the assessment. This building is not even on the property of the subject property that was being assessed. Not to mention the entire BPO is based on the wrong property as described in the mortgage documents. SPS continues to inflate the price of subject property in a fraudulent manner. 4- SPS ' BPO states the subject property has an estimated value of {$100000.00}, yet they forced placed insurance on the property in the amount of {$230000.00} in coverage from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX as Select Portfolio Servicing , Inc. named as the first insured ( Policy # XXXX ). This is not only unethical, it's illegal. 5- On XX/XX/XXXX, XXXX stated they provided me a copy of all origination related documents pertaining to account # XXXX. This was false and a misrepresentation of the facts. The documents included : Customer Application, Loan Agreement Including Truth-in-Lending Disclosure, Notice of Right to Cancel, Recorded Mortgage, Good Faith Estimate, HUD Settlement Statement, Servicing Transfer Disclosure Statement, Hazard Insurance Disclosure, Waiver of Escrow and Origination Appraisal. However, in SPS 's XX/XX/XXXX response they included a document entitled " Arbitration Rider '' as part of the alleged loan documents. I have never seen this document and XXXX has never provided it to me as a result of my numerous inquiries. As a result, I would like XXXX to explain why it was not sent with the documents requested and provide a copy of the document and any other document ( s ) they neglected to send me in their XX/XX/XXXX correspondence. Either the document does not exist and SPS fabricated it, or XXXX has once again been negligent in performing their duties. Please advise, I continue to assert SPS continues to act in a fraudulent manner and misrepresents their legal abilities as a servicer/debt collector.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-05-01
Boston, MA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-30
Arbutus, MD
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-30
Louisville, KY
Complaint: My complaint is against Select Portfolio Servicing , Inc. the Servicers of my loan Select Portfolio Servicing became the servicer the beginning of XXXX prior to that XXXX XXXX had the account. I received a letter from XXXX XXXX indicating that they were no longer the servicers but SPS was and that any arrangement or agreement that XXXX XXXX had prior to the change of Servicer that agreement would be honored by Select Portfolio Servicing. The letter sent to me from XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX states that. I continued to work very hard to make sure that XXXX XXXX had all the documents they needed to approve a short pay-off since that agreement would be honored.
Originally XXXX XXXX agreed to XXXX and that was the current offer on the table. However, as I started working with SPS they were reluctant to allow me to move forward with the XXXX short pay even though that was the agreement with the prior servicer.
SPS came back later and agreed to a XXXX Short Pay I agreed and moved forward to get the banks offer and closing date. I had to work very hard to remove erroneous property tax charges and other charges placed on my account to hinder me from selling my home outright.
We were about to close with the Bank and pay SPS as agreed but out of no wheres SPS pulled the agreement and stop the closing. I made a request from SPS to get updated settlement letter from SPS. For the closing but they refused and then backed completely out. They ordered an auction of my home without cause when I have the bank loan to pay the loan off.
SPS is fraudulent and deceptive practices should be stop. Please review the information I have submitted to show that their activity is very suspect and borderline criminal.
Please review the fabricated promissory note which has a notary they employ and the signature of the POA that does not exist., please see the attached. I have shown SPS and the investor several times that the original lender was out of business before they finance my loan. The Servicer as well as the attorney knows that the company had no license to do business in this state but continued to do business illegally.
The attorney General in this state has turned a blind eye to the situation even though hundreds of people have gotten loans and lost their home with the enormous fraud perpetuated by the authorities and those involved in this scam. The notice of error was sent out, but they ignored the RESPA violations.
There were issues with the closing, but they ignored that the information I provided which show that my loan was never assigned. They have no legal right to foreclose or auction my property.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-30
Apple Valley, CA
Didn't receive enough information to verify debt
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-30
La Habra, CA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-29
Newark, NJ
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-29
Fresno, TX
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-29
George School, PA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-29
Huntington Park, CA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-29
Chicago, IL
Company Response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error Closed with explanation
2019-04-29
Stevenson, MD
Complaint: Hello, I had taken out a HELOC with XXXX XXXX XXXX back in XXXX. Having XXXX kids I needed money for schol tuition, cars, clothes, medical and dental costs ( braces ) etc. So I had been making monthly payments every month without issue ( XXXX or so ) until in XXXX my monthly payment skyrocketed to quadruple that amount, XXXX a month. I called XXXX and was informed that the loan amoritized ( sp ) after 10 years unbeknownst to me. Living from paycheck to paycheck this was essentially a second house payment. I informed XXXX that I had no idea that this would happen when I took out the loan, indeed I would have never took out the loan had I known that. They claimed it was in the fine print. i tried to modify the loan two times, sending documentation of expenses, income etc and they claimed I did make enough money to modify. I lost my job with the federal government in XXXX and claimed Chapter XXXX bankruptcy and the XXXX HELOC was discharged as part of the bankruptcy as well but they said they could still take our house if we defaulted on the HELOC. XXXX XXXX XXXX has since sold my loan to Select Portfolio Services. Please advise if we may obtain any relief as we can not sustain this burden. Thanks in advance for your help in this matter, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-29
Nyc, NY
Complaint: Select Portfolio Servicing which holds the mortgage previously held by XXXX XXXX, is failing and refusing to correct improper filings they did with the county to permit me to refinance the mortgage. For the last month I have been told by them that they have escalated the issue, but I just have to wait until they get around to resolving the problem. I have asked to speak to a supervisor each time, and on each occasion have been told that a supervisor is not available, but will call me back in a couple of days. To date, I have not received a call back. Each time I call and ask for the person I spoke to previously, I am told that person is not available and I need to speak to whoever is currently available. It appears that they are intentionally delaying the process so they can maintain the income from my current mortgage. Initial calls to Select started in early XXXX, and have included calls two to three times a week, with the most recent call being today, XX/XX/2019. It should be noted that I am not seeking to refinance with Select, but will be refinanced by XXXX XXXX, which has approved refinancing but can not proceed to closure because of this issue.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-29
Louisville, KY
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-27
Glyndon, MD
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-27
Irvine, CA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-26
Apple Valley, CA
Collected or attempted to collect exempt funds
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-26
Smoke Rise, GA
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-26
Apple Valley, CA
Collected or attempted to collect exempt funds
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation
2019-04-26
West Salisbury, VT
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law Closed with explanation