There are over 115 complaints on file for BROCK SCOTT, PLLC. Dated between 2019-12-03 and 2014-03-07.
2016-01-19
Hi Vista, CA
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-12-31
Hilton Head, SC
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-12-24
Ft Myers, FL
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-12-22
Warrenton, VA
Seized/Attempted to seize property
Complaint: Debt Collectors are attempting to steal my home after the debt has been discharged lawfully in a Chapter XXXX bankruptcy. Discharge paperwork lists mortgage as fully discharged. Interlopers are trying to force me out of my home with threatening unsigned letters. I have made numerous requests for the full account loan data which have been ignored. I have also sent FDCPA Validation Letters that have been ignored.
Company Response: Closed
2015-11-25
Warrenton, VA
Seized/Attempted to seize property
Company Response: Company chooses not to provide a public response Closed with explanation
2015-11-19
Coral Springs, FL
Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-11-03
TN
Not given enough info to verify debt
Complaint: Received a regular mail notice of foreclosure dated XX/XX/XXXX and XXXX XXXX, 2015 see : Attached pages XXXX. On the steps of XXXX XXXX Courthouse. I have no knowledge of this company nor do I have any business or contractual matters with this firm. However it has obtained some of my personal information which I gave no consent to do so, XXXX name included in this alleged claim is that of a deceased being. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. XXXX and title VIII of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, I certified mailed a Notice to Dispute and Cease and Desist to senders see : attached pages XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX. Around XX/XX/XXXX again through regular mail, I received COPIES of requested information, request demanded according to law the original wet ink documents, furthermore even this copy of a copy has been altered see : attached page XXXX. The copies are not sworn to nor verified by any person making the alleged claim. Also to continue this deception on XX/XX/XXXX my personal property appeared in local newspaper, foreclosure/auction section. This has put harm to my reputation, sanctions shall be issued, chargeable on the Bond ( s ) of the " once verified '' parties making such fraudulent claims, all shall be fined for the actual damage cost and time that my family endured during this matter.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-10-30
Oxford, GA
Seized/Attempted to seize property
Complaint: I received a Notice to Foreclose on court house step for XXXX XXXX, XXXX. The notice is dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX from Brock & Scott PLLC. On XXXX XXXX, I sent a Dispute for the Foreclosure Notice requesting Brock & Scott PLLC to identity who they are, such as a holder in due course, a creditor, etc., and who authorized or gave them the authority to foreclosure along with a list of other questions I needed answered. Brock & Scott is a XXXX party debt collector and do n't have standing to foreclose. I asked for payoff information as well. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, I received a copy of the security deed ( stamped original ) and a bad copy of the " Note '' and the accounting that I never asked for. None of the other questions were answered. Under the FDCPA it states foreclosures must be done in a judicial court. They are threating to sell my property on the courthouse steps on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. The lender listed on my paperwork is XXXX. XXXX did an assignment in XXXX to XXXX, but XXXX was bankrupt and no longer in existence in XXXX. How is that possible?
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-10-28
Green Acres, FL
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-10-28
Silver Spring, MD
Debt was paid
Complaint: The law firmBROCK & SCOTT, PLLC has been harrassing me and my family about an alleged debt without and debt validation or verification.
Per FDCPA rule : The attorney thus violated 15 U.S.C. 1692e ( 3 ) and ( 10 ) ,1. The law firm invaded the privacy of an individual by unreasonably intruding upon his seclusion by communication through the USPS via first class mail in relation to an alleged debt that did not owe to the law firm.
2. The law firm and its agent 's acted in a false, deceptive, misleading and unfair manner by repeatedly communicating with me via USPS mail without validating and verifying the alleged debt.
See attachment :
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-10-20
Riverdale, GA
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-10-15
Aspen Hill, MD
Frequent or repeated calls
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-10-08
Silver Spring, MD
Sued w/o proper notification of suit
Complaint: BROCK & SCOTT , PLLC has filed a lawsuit in the court on adebt that is time-barred. Additionally, they filed a false case # in the land record.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-09-30
Aspen Hill, MD
Threatened to sue on too old debt
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-09-21
Warrenton, VA
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-08-27
Cedartown, GA
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-06-24
Taylors, SC
Attempted to collect wrong amount
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-06-08
Company Response: Closed with non-monetary relief
2015-05-27
Hampton, VA
Complaint: I was XXXX of an organization, XXXX XXXX XXXX from XXXX XXXX. I turned the organizations checking account over to the new XXXX XXXX XXXX. However, I did not remove my name from the account because I was in the process of filing embezzlement charges against the XXXX during my tenure. The XXXX was suppose to close the account and open a new account. The new account was opened and the XXXX made personal charges on the account. The XXXX did not pay the account so they sent correspondence requesting that I pay the account. Upon explaining to the lawyer of Brock and Scott the situation about six months ago, that this was an organization I had not been apart of it since XXXX, the lawyer agreed with me. The lawyer form Brock and Scott sent a letter to me acknowledging that I did not have anything to do with the account as such my name would be removed. The XXXX failed to pay the account and earlier this month, I received a Warrant in Debt along with the XXXX for the amount plus attorneys fees. The lawyers will not take my call and keep saying that XXXX has made arrangements to pay by XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. This should resolve the debt. The problem I have is that I should not be a party to this debt regardless of what happens. Brock and Scott only sent the communications regarding this settlement to XXXX and not to me. These communications contained my Personal name and address. So now they are only communicating with the XXXX and not me but sending emails and letters addressed to me to the XXXX. This is a violation of the law and I want my name removed as previously indicated by Brock and Scott. The XXXX even signed a statement acknowledging that the debt is his. This was sent to the Brock and Scott but I have not received any response. To date, I have requested all correspondence sent to me about the debt from Brock and scott but they have failed to do so.
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-05-15
Charlotte, NC
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-04-30
Newport, TN
Frequent or repeated calls
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-04-07
Conyers, GA
Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-03-16
Lithonia, GA
Not given enough info to verify debt
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-03-02
Atl, GA
Seized/Attempted to seize property
Company Response: Closed with explanation
2015-01-20
Atl, GA
Attempted to collect wrong amount
Company Response: Closed with explanation